![]() The Trump task force has three risk levels: red, yellow, green. “We also collectively need to keep focused on what should be our main target: a path to near zero case incidence.” “The public needs clear and consistent information about COVID risk levels in different jurisdictions for personal decision-making, and policy-makers need clear and consistent visibility that permits differentiating policy across jurisdictions,” said Danielle Allen, director of Harvard’s Safra Center. It also raises the question of whether Americans will look back on unheeded recommendations such as Harvard’s with regret this fall, when colder weather, increased indoor activity and, in many places, a return to in-person schooling compound the risk of a second wave of infection - especially if dozens of states remain in the so-called red zone. This difference underscores the ongoing inconsistency of America’s efforts to combat COVID-19. ![]() Yet Harvard and the Trump task force arrive at very different conclusions about how communities should be responding. They even share a goal: to provide clear metrics that will “help communities determine the severity of the outbreak they are responding to,” as the Harvard initiative puts it, then offer “broad guidance on the intensity of control efforts needed based on these COVID risk levels.” They’re using similar color-coded risk charts. The White House task force and the Harvard researchers are relying on the same data. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |